Intro to Ethics Study Guide Essay

1. social gravel opening is to give up near to have a government, animals come in the public court of opinion. Animals atomic number 18 winding implicit it can be inferred they abide to hu earthly concern beings and push downing them would interfere with the correspondence in the ecosystem 2. honor ethics-aristotle would argue that if you were to kill an animal without morality would be debauched. victimization too much compassion or too little. Doing the discipline involvement beca design it is the right thing. 1st categorical imperative. If that maxim is fit to induce a universal impartiality. A maxim would be to care for animals 3. Util- it depends on the situation who it makes happy more who is convenient? Can you do better with your clock clock2. If John has a day attain from work and stays home whole day wankting drunk, then Utilitarianism would pronounce that it is okay for john to do that sightedness that he is home al iodin and he is not b different ing anyone. His family and friends are not certified of what he is doing and he decided to stimulate drunk which makes his happiness the highest. Yet, it essential be considered what John could have done in that period of time that could have been about beneficial to the community. The morally right thing betion brings the highest crystallise or boilersuit happiness which John did not provide.This brings up Hedonism where the right interpretions just now have outgo results that are assessd so the remainder should be to maximize the total measure of happiness. John could have done other things without that day deal volunteering at a hospital or visit his family. According to Utilitarianism, John decided to get drunk which is not following through with the Utilitarian right of action by doing something that would give the most happiness. Morality is the childbed to guide ones predominate by reason and have the high hat reasons for doing them. So, if Johns drinking is not backed up with the better(p) reasons potential for doing them, then Johns finale is not morally correct harmonise to utilitarianism. 3.4. We are obligated to keep our foretells jibe to all four theories. Utilitarianism If my happiness outweighs the net happiness of the someone of whom I destiny to pall the promise with, then utilitarianism would guess that it is okay to recession the promise comprehend that it would give me the most amount of happiness. But, if you break that promise and continue to break promises you do to your friend, then that would eventually consider to your best friend being unhappy with you and break the friendship apart unless that friend does not care about broken promises. Kantian ethics We should keep our promises because we are to act only according to that maxim by which it get out at the same time plump a universal law.If we were to promise to pay someone back and never planned to pay them back for genuinely and broke that promise, then if that was to become a universal law no one would trusts each other or suppose pot when they say they will owe them back. Thus, this will break friendships and leave the beingness with broken promises. Social contract theory depends if the person falsehood is doing something for good righteousness ethics practical wisdom on which right to use. Knowing what equity to use in what situation.5. Kant thought lying was immoral because our behavior should be guided by universal laws which are moral rules that hold true in all circumstances. Kant says that lying under any circumstances is the annihilation of ones dignity as a human being nonetheless a small white law is unacceptable. His argument consisted of it being okay to fabrication or lying becoming popular. You should act in a way if it was to become a universal law so this universal law of lying would lead to everyone lying and the purpose would be self-defeating, no one would believe each other, and no one would pay attention to what you say. Essentially, Kant believes that we should only do the actions that conform to rules that we would adopt universally.7.virtue is a commonwealth of character that lies between by doing a virtuous act you will become virtuous because it will become a habit coward-courage 8. If known wrap up comes to your home searching your friend, A virtue theorist would tell the truth. Although he has virtues like loyalty and honesty which he neediness to keep true, I would have to study between one or the other. Virtues are desired states of character that are withal excellence that brings into good conditions therefore people strive to have these virtues.The friend must choose to whether tell the truth to the manslayer which is a virtue of having honesty or tell a lie to the liquidator to help his friend which is a virtue of loyalty to their friend. Although both virtues are alpha and one would not want to enrol in the murder of their friend, a virtue theorist w ould essentially tell the murderer the truth since lying is treating a person as mere stand fors because you are apply them to lie instead of using them as endsvirtue is a state of character concerned with choice and so lying in a mean would be determined by the demythologized principle which can only be determined by a man of practical wisdom.-virtue looks for what is intermediate.